4.5 Article

Second cancer risk in adults receiving autologous haematopoietic SCT for cancer: a population-based cohort study

期刊

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 49, 期 5, 页码 691-698

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2014.13

关键词

autologous transplantation; outcomes; risk; surveillance

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [APP568775]
  2. Arrow Bone Marrow Transplant Foundation Australia
  3. Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing
  4. BMT Network NSW
  5. Arrow Bone Marrow Transplant Foundation
  6. St Vincent's Hospital Darlinghurst
  7. Australian Bone Marrow Donor Registry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Population-based evidence on second cancer risk following autologous haematopoietic SCT (HCT) is lacking. We quantified second cancer risk for a national, population-based cohort of adult Australians receiving autologous HCT for cancer and notified to the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry 1992-2007 (n = 7765). Cancer diagnoses and deaths were ascertained by linkage with the Australian Cancer Database and National Death Index. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated and Cox regression models were used to estimate within-cohort risk factors treating death as a competing risk. During a median 2.5 years follow-up, second cancer risk was modestly increased compared with the general population (SIR 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2-1.6); significantly elevated risk was also observed for AML/myelodysplastic syndrome (SIR = 20.6), melanoma (SIR = 2.6) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (SIR = 3.3). Recipients at elevated risk of any second cancer included males, and those transplanted at a younger age, in an earlier HCT era, or for lymphoma or testicular cancer. Male sex, older age (> 45 years) and history of relapse after HCT predicted melanoma risk. Transplantation for Hodgkin lymphoma and older age were associated with lung cancer risk. Second malignancies are an important late effect and these results inform and emphasize the need for cancer surveillance in autologous HCT survivors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据