4.5 Article

Effects of an outpatient physical exercise program on hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients: a randomized clinical trial

期刊

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 46, 期 9, 页码 1245-1255

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2010.288

关键词

hematopoietic SCT; physical exercise; physical fitness; quality-of-life

资金

  1. Zurcher Krebsliga (Zurich)
  2. Eidgenossische Sportkommission, (Magglingen)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients who undergo hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) often experience physical and psychological problems, even long after treatment has been completed. This study was performed to evaluate the effects of a 12-week outpatient physical exercise (PE) program, incorporating aerobic and strength exercises, as compared with a usual care control condition on patients' physical performance and psychosocial well-being. Patients who had completed HSCT up to 6 months earlier were randomly assigned to a supervised PE program (n = 64) or a usual care control group (n = 67). Primary outcomes were quantified physical performance and self-reported physical functioning. Secondary outcomes were body composition measurement, quantified walking activity and patient-reported outcomes (physical activity, fatigue and health-related quality of life). Assessments were at baseline, immediately after program completion and at 3-month follow-up. Significant intervention effects were observed at both posttreatment and follow-up on physical performance measures. No other outcomes yielded statistically significant group differences. PE should be considered in the management of HSCT recipients to improve physical performance after discharge from the hospital. Further research is needed to determine how the program can be enhanced so that improved physical performance also translates into improved physical and psychosocial functioning in daily life. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2011) 46, 1245-1255; doi:10.1038/bmt.2010.288; published online 6 December 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据