4.5 Article

Blood stream infection (BSI) and acute GVHD after hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) are associated

期刊

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 46, 期 2, 页码 300-307

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2010.112

关键词

hematopoietic SCT; blood stream infection; acute GVHD; mortality; multivariable model

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Center for Research Resources [5K23 RR020042-04]
  2. Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute [1UL1RR025752/1KL2RR025751]
  3. Tufts University School of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blood stream infection (BSI) and acute GVHD (aGVHD) are serious complications of hematopoietic SCT (HSCT). We hypothesized that the two events were not independent of one another. We studied (1) associations between BSI and aGVHD; and (2) the impact of BSI and/or aGVHD on death within 100 days after HSCT, using a retrospective cohort analysis. Risk factor analysis was carried out using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. Of 211 patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT from January 2000 to December 2005 (58% of whom underwent reduced intensity transplantation), 82 (39%) developed BSI. In 49 patients (23%), grade (gr) 2-4 aGVHD occurred. Early BSI was independently associated with an increased occurrence of subsequent aGVHD gr 2-4. CMV seropositivity was independently associated with decreased occurrence of aGVHD. aGVHD gr 2-4 independently predicted subsequent first BSI. Both BSI and aGVHD gr 2-4 were significant independent predictors of death within 100 days after HSCT. There is a strong, independent association between BSI and aGVHD. Potential explanations include the elaboration of cytokines during BSI favoring the development of aGVHD and/or the immunosuppressive treatment of aGVHD favoring the development of BSI. Future studies should be directed at the mechanistic investigations of this association. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2011) 46, 300-307; doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.112; published online 17 May 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据