4.5 Article

The number of infused CD34+cells does not influence the incidence of GVHD or the outcome of allogeneic PBSC transplantation, using reduced-intensity conditioning and antithymocyte globulin

期刊

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 45, 期 7, 页码 1189-1196

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2009.331

关键词

CD34+cell dose; graft-versus-host disease; reduced-intensity conditioning; non-myeloablative conditioning

资金

  1. Danny Cunniff Leukemia Research Laboratory
  2. Gabrielle Rich Leukemia Research Foundation
  3. Cancer Treatment Research Foundation
  4. Novotny Trust
  5. ESP Pharma, Edison, NJ, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of graft composition on the outcome of reduced-intensity (RIC) allogeneic PBSC transplantation (allo-PBSC) remains controversial. In this study, we analyzed the impact of CD34+ cell dose on the incidence of GVHD, and on the outcome after allo-PBSC, in 103 patients with hematological malignancies, using a uniform RIC regimen. The following variables were included in statistical analysis: (1) number of C34+ cells, (2) high-risk vs low-risk disease status, (3) matched related vs matched unrelated donor, (4) female donor to male recipient vs any other combination, (5) age of recipient (above vs below the median). Univariate and multivariate analysis did not reveal any association between CD34+ cell dose and acute grade-2 to grade-4, cGVHD, non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse rate (RR) and OS. High-risk disease status was the only variable independently associated with increased NRM (P = 0.001), increased RR (P = 0.012) and decreased OS (P < 0.001). The same results were obtained when analysis was restricted to a subgroup of 55 patients with myeloid neoplasms. The influence of graft composition on the outcome of RIC allo-PBSC should be further investigated via well-controlled randomized prospective studies. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2010) 45, 1189-1196; doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.331; published online 30 November 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据