4.8 Article

Real Time Monitoring of Layer-by-Layer Polyelectrolyte Deposition and Bacterial Enzyme Detection in Nanoporous Anodized Aluminum Oxide

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 87, 期 7, 页码 3856-3863

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac504626m

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Government's Cooperative Research Centres Program
  2. EU [245500, 295155]
  3. DAAD
  4. ATN-DAAD grant
  5. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung BMBF
  6. Wound Management Innovation CRC
  7. University of South Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous anodized aluminum oxide (pAAO),is a nano-structured material, which due to its optical properties lends itself to the design of optical biosensors where interactions in the pores of this material are transduced into interferometric reflectance shifts. In this study, a pAAO-based biosensor was developed as a biosensing platform to detect proteinase K, an enzyme which, is a readily available model system for the proteinase produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The pAAO pore walls are decorated by means of the layer-by-layer (LbL) deposition technique using poly(sodium-4-styrenesulfonate) and poly-L-lysine as negatively and positively charged polyelectrolytes, respectively. Interferometric reflectance spectroscopy utilized to observe the optical properties of pAAO during LbL deposition shows that the deposition of the polyelectrolyte onto the pore walls increase the net refractive index, thus red-shifting the effective optical thickness (BOT). Upon incubation with proteinase K, a conspicuous blue shift of the EOT observed, which is attributed to the destabilization of the LbL film upon enzymatic degradation of the poly-L-lysine components. This result is confirmed by scanning electron microscopy results. Finally, as a proof-Of-principle, we demonstrate the ability of the label-free pAAO-based biosensing platform to detect the presence of the proteinase K in human Wound fluid, highlighting the potential for detection of bacterial infections in chronic wounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据