4.5 Article

Unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

期刊

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 175-180

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2008.133

关键词

hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; unrelated donor transplant; conditioning regimen; mortality; bone marrow graft

资金

  1. CIBMTR [U24-CA76518]
  2. National Cancer Institute
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  4. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
  5. Office of Naval Research
  6. Health Resources and Services Administration (DHHS)
  7. AABB
  8. Aetna
  9. American International Group Inc.
  10. American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
  11. Amgen Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report outcomes after unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for 91 patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) transplanted in the US in 1989-2005. Fifty-one percent were <1 year at HCT and 29% had Lansky performance scores <90%. Most (80%) were conditioned with BU, CY, and etoposide (VP16) with or without anti-thymocyte globulin. Bone marrow was the predominant graft source. Neutrophil recovery was 91% at day-42. The probabilities of grades 2-4 acute GVHD at day-100 and chronic GVHD at 5 years were 41 and 23%, respectively. The overall mortality rate was higher in patients who did not receive BU/CY/VP16-conditioning regimen (RR 1.95, P = 0.035). The 5-year probability of overall survival was 53% in patients who received BU/CY/VP16 compared to 24% in those who received other regimens. In the subset of patients with known disease-specific characteristics, only one of five patients with active disease at HCT is alive. For those in clinical remission at HCT (n = 46), the 5-year probability of overall survival was 49%. Early mortality rates after HCT were high, 35% at day-100. These data demonstrate that a BU/CY/VP16-conditioning regimen provides cure in approximately 50% of patients and future studies should explore strategies to lower early mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据