4.6 Article

Exercise and bone mineral density in men: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

期刊

BONE
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 103-111

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.11.031

关键词

Exercise; Bone; Osteoporosis; Men; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. United States Department of Defense, Army Medical Research 82 Materiel Command [W81XWH-10-1-0276]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Use the meta-analytic approach to examine the effects of ground and/or joint reaction force exercise on femoral neck (FN) and lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) in men. Methods: Randomized controlled exercise trials >= 24 weeks were included. Standardized effect sizes (g) were calculated and pooled using random-effects models, z-score alpha values and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was examined using Q and I-2. Statistical significance was set at a two-tailed alpha value (p) of <= 0.05 and a trend at >0.05 to <= 0.10. Results: A moderate and statistically significant improvement was found at the FN (3 g's, 187 participants, g=0.583, 95% CI=0.031, 1.135, p=0.04, Q=5.6, p=0.06, I-2=64%) while a small trend was observed at the LS (5 g's, 275 participants, g=0.190, 95% CI=-0.036, 0.416, p=0.10, Q=3.0, p= 0.55, I-2=0%) Results were sensitive to influence analysis as well as collapsing multiple groups from the same studies so that only one g represented each study. Conclusions: There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend ground and/or joint reaction force exercise for improving and/or maintaining FN and LS BMD in men. Additional well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed before any final recommendations can be formulated. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据