4.6 Article

Structure and quantification of microvascularisation within mouse long bones: What and how should we measure?

期刊

BONE
卷 50, 期 1, 页码 390-399

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.09.051

关键词

Bone microvascularisation; Baryum sulfate infusion; mu CT; Vascular quantification; Histology

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR AdapHyG)
  2. CNES (Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales)
  3. Societe Francaise de Rhumatologie

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone marrow vascularisation is involved in both remodeling and hematopoiesis. Challenged mouse models often require imaging and quantitative assessment of blood vessels and bone cell activities for a better understanding of the role of the vascular system. In this study we compared images of mouse hind limb long bone vascularisation after infusion of either barium sulfate or lead chromate-loaded silicon. The images were then analyzed through histology as well as low-resolution and synchrotron-radiation microtomography. We show that barium sulfate infusion provides the best vessel images and furthermore, that it is compatible with staining procedures used in bone histomorphometry and CD31 immunohistochemistry. Bone marrow vascularisation displays large structural and spatial distribution heterogeneity, including large lobular clusters of sinusoids and an unexpectedly substantial amount of capillaries in the adipocytes-rich distal third of the tibia. For an unbiased assessment of bone vascular development/changes, these features must be taken into account. We describe the conditions under which the quantification of microvascularisation on histological sections of barium-infused long bones is reproducible, as applied to seven-month-old male C57/BI6J and mixed CD1/129Sv/J mice, and we propose a nomenclature for the histological parameters measured. Finally, we validate our technique by studying the effect of ovariectomy on mouse tibial vascular density. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据