4.6 Article

Cortical microstructure and estimated bone strength in young amenorrheic athletes, eumenorrheic athletes and non-athletes

期刊

BONE
卷 51, 期 4, 页码 680-687

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.07.019

关键词

Athletes; Adolescents; Bone strength; Stiffness; Failure load

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [UL1 RR025758, 1 UL1 RR025758-01, S10 RR 023405] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD060827, 1 R01 HD060827-01A1] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK040561] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Lower bone density in young amenorrheic athletes (AA) compared to eumenorrheic athletes (EA) and non-athletes may increase fracture risk during a critical time of bone accrual. Finite element analysis (FEA) is a unique tool to estimate bone strength in vivo, and the contribution of cortical microstructure to bone strength in young athletes is not well understood. Objective: We hypothesized that FEA-estimated stiffness and failure load are impaired in AA at the distal radius and tibia compared to EA and non-athletes despite weight-bearing exercise. Design and setting: Cross-sectional study; Clinical Research Center Subjects: 34 female endurance athletes involved in weight-bearing sports (17 AA, 17 EA) and 16 non-athletes (14-21 years) of comparable age, maturity and BMI Outcome measures: We used HR-pQCT images to assess cortical microarchitecture and FEA to estimate bone stiffness and failure load. Results: Cortical perimeter, porosity and trabecular area at the weight-bearing tibia were greater in both groups of athletes than non-athletes, whereas the ratio (%) of cortical to total area was lowest in AA. Despite greater cortical porosity in EA, estimated tibial stiffness and failure load was higher than in non-athletes. However, this advantage was lost in AA. At the non-weight-bearing radius, failure load and stiffness were lower in AA than non-athletes. After controlling for lean mass and menarchal age, athletic status accounted for 5-9% of the variability in stiffness and failure load, menarchal age for 8-23%, and lean mass for 12-37%. Conclusion: AA have lower FEA-estimated bone strength at the distal radius than non-athletes, and lose the advantage of weight-bearing exercise seen in EA at the distal tibia. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据