4.6 Article

TGF-β regulates sclerostin expression via the ECR5 enhancer

期刊

BONE
卷 50, 期 3, 页码 663-669

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.11.016

关键词

Transforming growth factor-beta; Sost; ECR5; Osteoblast; Bone; Wnt

资金

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [R03AR057547]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK075730]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wnt signaling is critical for skeletal development and homeostasis. Sclerostin (Sost) has emerged as a potent inhibitor of Wnt signaling and, thereby, bone formation. Thus, strategies to reduce sclerostin expression may. be used to treat osteoporosis or non-union fractures. Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) elicits various effects upon the skeleton both in vitro and in vivo depending on the duration and timing of administration. In vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate that TGF-beta increases osteoprogenitor differentiation but decreases matrix mineralization of committed osteoblasts. Because sclerostin decreases matrix mineralization, this study aimed to examine whether TGF-beta achieves such inhibitory effects via transcriptional modulation of Sost. Using the UMR106.01 mature osteoblast cell line, we demonstrated that TGF-beta TGF-beta(1)-beta(2)-beta(3) and Activin A increase Sost transcript expression. Pharmacologic inhibition of Alk4/5/7 in vitro and in vivo decreased endogenous Sost expression, and siRNA against Alk4 and Alk5 demonstrated their requirement for endogenous Sost expression. TGF-beta(1), targeted the Sost bone enhancer ECR5 and did not affect the transcriptional activity of the endogenous Sost promoter. These results indicate that TGF-beta(1) controls Sost transcription in mature osteoblasts, suggesting that sclerostin may mediate the inhibitory effect of TGF-beta upon osteoblast differentiation. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据