4.6 Article

Effects of 3 years of lasofoxifene treatment on bone turnover markers in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis

期刊

BONE
卷 50, 期 5, 页码 1135-1140

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.02.004

关键词

Osteoporosis; Bone turnover marker; Clinical trial; Treatment

资金

  1. Pfizer Inc.
  2. National Institute of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aims of this study were to describe the changes in bone turnover markers (BTMs) in response to lasofoxifene therapy; to describe the changes in BTMs in the individual; and to examine the relationships between BTM levels on treatment and treatment outcomes. Women (n = 1126) aged 59-80 years with femoral neck or spine bone mineral density T-scores <=-2.5 were randomized to lasofoxifene 0.25 mg/d, 0.5 mg/d, or placebo for 5 years. We measured serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and serum procollagen I N-propeptide (PINP), osteocalcin, and bone alkaline phosphatase (ALP) at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Lasofoxifene therapy resulted in a decrease in the concentrations of bone resorption and bone formation markers compared with placebo; the decrease was maximal between 6 and 24 months. The effect of lasofoxifene 0.5 mg/d was similar to that of lasofoxifene 0.25 mg/d. The decrease in bone ALP was less than the decreases in CTX, osteocalcin, and PINP. Lasofoxifene therapy 0.5 mg/d resulted in BTM-defined response rates for CTX (decrease in concentration from baseline > 60%), PINP (> 50%), and bone ALP (> 30%) of 35%, 45%, and 43% of women at month 12, respectively, compared with placebo responses of 4%, 4%, and 7%. In contrast, the increase in BMD took longer (50% responded after 36 months of lasofoxifene 0.5 mg/d) and was not as specific (15% of placebo group responded). Bone density change was weakly inversely correlated with change in the concentrations of BTMs. BTMs may prove useful in the monitoring of the response to lasofoxifene treatment for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis early in the course of treatment. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据