4.6 Article

Effects of ovariectomy on the changes in microarchitecture and material level properties in response to hind leg disuse in female rats

期刊

BONE
卷 51, 期 3, 页码 586-591

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.05.001

关键词

Nanoindentation; Ovariectomy; Neurectomy; Osteoporosis; Bone strength

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Ovariectomy (OVX) and immobilization are known to decrease bone mineral density and alter its microarchitecture. Their effects on the material level properties of bone, a determinant of bone strength, are still largely unknown. We investigated the effect of OVX and/or disuse achieved by sciatic neurectomy (NX) in 6-month-old Sprague Dawley female rats. Methods: At baseline, animals underwent OVX or sham operation. At week 16, NX was performed on the left hindlimb while the right hindlimb was sham-operated. All animals were sacrificed at week 40. Proximal tibiae and vertebral bodies (L4) were evaluated by micro-computed tomographic morphometry (mu CT). Material level properties (elastic modulus, hardness, and dissipated energy) were evaluated by a nanoindentation test. Results: At the proximal tibia, OVX and NX decreased relative bone volume, the former mainly through a reduction in trabecular number, and the latter through a decrease in trabecular thickness. NX decreased modulus (-10%; p<0.001) and dissipated energy (-13.3%, p<0.001) in cortical bone, and modulus (-16.8%, p = 0.004), hardness (-29.3%, p =- 0.004), and dissipated energy (-17.7%, p = 0.01) in trabecular bone, while OVX decreased cortical bone dissipated energy (-14.6%, p<0.001) and trabecular bone hardness (-19.4%, p = 0.05). In the vertebral body, OVX altered mainly the trabecular microarchitecture and nanoindentation variables. Conclusion: These results show that NX with and without OVX markedly alter material level properties in addition to an alteration of bone microarchitecture, although not in the same manner. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据