4.1 Article

Effect of ceralifimod (ONO-4641) on lymphocytes and cardiac function: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label fingolimod arm

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 55, 期 9, 页码 1051-1060

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcph.513

关键词

pharmacodynamics; lymphocyte count; heart rate; sphingosine-1-phosphate

资金

  1. EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, Massachusetts, a subsidiary of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
  2. EMD Serono, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-arm, parallel-design study investigated cardiac and hematological pharmacodynamic effects of ceralifimod (ONO-4641), a selective sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator, over a broad dose range in direct comparison with the nonselective S1P modulator fingolimod. Healthy subjects were assigned to ceralifimod (0.01, 0.025, 0.05, or 0.10mg), fingolimod (0.5mg), or placebo once daily for 14 days (n=24 per group). After 14 days of treatment, mean absolute lymphocyte count percentage change from baseline was greatest in the fingolimod (-62%) and ceralifimod 0.10mg (-56%) groups. On treatment cessation, lymphocyte recovery was faster in the ceralifimod versus the fingolimod group. Ceralifimod showed dose- and concentration-dependent chronotropic effect. Cardiac effects in the fingolimod group were dependent on fingolimod-P concentrations. Maximum mean heart rate (HR) effect on day 1 was larger with fingolimod (placebo-adjusted change from time-matched baseline HR [HR], -14.9 beats per minute [bpm]) versus ceralifimod (HR, -6.2 and -12.0 bpm for the 0.05- and 0.10-mg doses, respectively). Ceralifimod's effect on the PR interval was minor. Safety biomarker results suggest that potential therapeutic doses of ceralifimod, in particular the 0.05-mg dose, might result in reduced occurrence of bradycardia, atrioventricular block absolute lymphocyte count and grade 3/4 lymphopenia compared with fingolimod 0.5mg.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据