4.6 Article

Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid osteoporosis in men: results of a randomized controlled trial comparing zoledronic acid with risedronate

期刊

BONE
卷 50, 期 1, 页码 289-295

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.10.024

关键词

Glucocorticoids; Osteoporosis; Zoledronic acid; Risedronate; Bone mineral density

资金

  1. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
  2. Merck
  3. Sanofi -Aventis
  4. Servier
  5. Novartis
  6. Roche
  7. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council
  8. Sharpe Dohme
  9. Alliance
  10. Amgen
  11. Nycomed
  12. Procter Gamble
  13. Eli Lilly Co
  14. Aventis
  15. TAP
  16. GlaxoSmithKline
  17. Merckle
  18. Negma
  19. Lilly
  20. Wyeth
  21. NPS
  22. Theramex
  23. UCB
  24. Shame Dohme
  25. Rottapharm
  26. IBSA
  27. Genevrier
  28. Teijin
  29. Teva
  30. Ebewee Pharma
  31. Zodiac
  32. Ana lis
  33. Novo Nordisk
  34. Bristol Myers Squibb

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We studied 265 men (mean age 56.4 years; range 18-83 years), among patients enrolled in two arms of a double-blind, 1-year study comparing the effects of zoledronic acid (ZOL) with risedronate (RIS) in patients either commencing (prednisolone 7.5 mg/day or equivalent) (prevention arm, n = 88) or continuing glucocorticoid therapy (treatment arm, n = 177). Methods: Patients received either a single ZOL 5 mg infusion or RIS 5 mg oral daily at randomization, along with calcium (1000 mg) and vitamin D (400-1200 ID). Primary endpoint: difference in percentage change from baseline in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints: percentage changes in BMD at total hip (TH) and femoral neck (FN), relative changes in bone turnover markers (beta-CTx and P1NP), and overall safety. Findings: In the treatment subpopulation, ZOL increased LS BMD by 4.7% vs. 3.3% for RIS and at TH the percentage changes were 1.8% vs. 0.2%, respectively. In the prevention subpopulation, bone loss was prevented by both treatments. At LS the percentage changes were 2.5% vs. -0.2% for ZOL vs. RIS and at TH the percentage changes were 1.1% vs. -0.4%, respectively. ZOL significantly increased lumbar spine BMD more than RIS at Month 12 in both the prevention population (p = 0.0024) and the treatment subpopulation (p = 0.0232) in men. In the treatment subpopulation, ZOL demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in serum beta-CTx and P1NP relative to RIS at all time-points. In the prevention subpopulation. ZOL significantly reduced beta-CTx at all time-points, and P1NP at Month 3 (p = 0.0297) only. Both treatments were well tolerated in men, albeit with a higher incidence of influenza-like illness and pyrexia events post-infusion with ZOL. Interpretation: Once-yearly ZOL preserves or increases BMD within 1 year to a greater extent than daily RIS ill men receiving glucocorticoid therapy. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据