4.6 Article

Bisphosphonate treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis is associated with a dose dependent increase in serum sclerostin

期刊

BONE
卷 50, 期 3, 页码 739-742

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.11.028

关键词

Sclerostin; Bone turnover markers; Bisphosphonates; Osteoporosis; Menopause

资金

  1. Abiogen-Pharma S.p.A., Pisa, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The benefits coming from long-term treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with bisphophonates are limited by a coupled decrease in bone formation. The objective of this study is to determine whether this decrease in bone formation is associated with changes in serum levels of the WNT signaling antagonist sclerostin or Dickkopf-1 (DKK1). This is an ancillary observation from patients participating in a 12 months, phase 2, randomized clinical trial. We analyzed 107 patients given either monthly intramuscular neridronate (12.5, 25 or 50 mg) or placebo. Serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (sCTX, a bone-resorption marker) decreased by 61%, 75% and 73% in the 12.5, 25 and 50 mg dose groups, respectively. Mean changes in bone alkaline phosphatase (bAP) at 12 months were -47%, -60.0% and -52.6% in the groups receiving 12.5, 25 or 50 mg neridronate, respectively. Serum DKK1 remained unchanged at all time points in the 3 groups. Serum sclerostin increased versus placebo group gradually and significantly only in patients treated with 25 or 50 mg neridronate monthly, reaching 138-148% of baseline values (P<0.001). Changes in serum sclerostin at 12 months were negatively correlated with changes in bAP (P<0.001) even when data were adjusted for sCTX changes and only treated patients were included. In conclusions, decreased bone formation after several months of bisphosphonate therapy is associated with increased serum levels of sclerostin. This might suggest that Wnt signaling may play a role in the coupling between resorption and formation. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据