4.6 Article

High-dose oral vitamin D3 supplementation in rheumatology patients with severe vitamin D3 deficiency

期刊

BONE
卷 45, 期 4, 页码 747-749

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.06.012

关键词

Vitamin D; Musculoskeletal disorders; Osteoporosis; Vitamin supplement; Vitamin deficiency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Recent large trials indicate that adherence associated with a daily regimen of vitamin D is low and limits anti-fracture efficacy with vitamin D supplementation. The aim of this report is to describe changes of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) serum concentrations achieved with a single oral dose of 300000 IU vitamin D3. Methods: Over a course of 4 months, we identified 33 elderly with severe vitamin D deficiency (25(OH) D<25 nmol/1) on admission to acute care. Patients were admitted for musculoskeletal pain, bone disease, or gait abnormalities. The mean age was 80.5 years (SD +/- 6.1). All patients were treated with a single oral dose of 300000 IU D3 in combination with 500-1000 mg calcium supplements per day depending on their dietary calcium intake. Results: Baseline mean 25(OH)D serum concentrations were 15 nmol/l (SD +/- 5.5). Mean 25(OH)D serum concentrations increased to 81.4 nmol/l (SD +/- 29.7) at 3 months (29 patients) and were still 69.0 nmol/l (SD +/- 17.9) at 6 months (26 patients). Mean serum calcium levels were 2.24 mmol/l (SD +/- 0.11) at baseline. 2.28 mmol/l (SD +/- 0.18) at 3 months, and 2.28 mmol/l (SD +/- 0.13) at 6 months. Two patients with mild hypercalcemia (2.69 mmol/l) at 3 months had normal values at 6 months. Conclusion: Based On our observations, a single oral dose of 300000 IU vitamin D3 raises mean 25(OH) D serum concentrations to the target mean of above 75 nmol/l at 3 months and a mean level of 69 nmol/1 at 6 months. As calcium absorption is enhanced with higher 25(OH)D serum concentrations, calcium supplementation may need downward adjustment with this regimen to avoid mild hypercalcemia. (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据