4.6 Article

Dual effect of strontium ranelate: Stimulation of osteoblast differentiation and inhibition of osteoclast formation and resorption in vitro

期刊

BONE
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 129-138

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.08.043

关键词

osteoblast; osteoclast; strontium ranelate; bone formation; cytoskeleton

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strontium ranelate is a newly developed drug that has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, including those of the hip, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. In contrast to other available treatments for osteoporosis, strontium ranelate increases bone formation and decreases resorption. In this study, the dual mode of action of strontium ranelate in bone was tested in vitro, on primary murine osteoblasts and osteoclasts derived from calvaria and spleen cells, respectively. We show that strontium ranelate treatment, either continuously or during proliferation or differentiation phases of mouse calvaria cells, stimulates osteoblast formation. Indeed after 22 days of continuous treatment with strontium ranelate, the expression of the osteoblast markers ALP, BSP and OCN was increased, and was combined with an increase in bone nodule numbers. On the other hand, the number of mature osteoclasts strongly decreased after strontium ranelate treatment. Similarly to previous studies, we confirm that osteoclasts resorbing activity was also reduced but we found that strontium ranelate treatment was associated with a disruption of the osteoclast actin-containing sealing zone. Therefore, our in vitro assays performed on primary murine bone cells confirmed the dual action of strontium ranelate in vivo as an anabolic agent on bone remodeling. It stimulates bone formation through its positive action on osteoblast differentiation and function, and decreases osteoclast differentiation as well as function by disrupting actin cytoskeleton organization. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据