4.0 Article

Integration of metabolic databases for the reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic networks

期刊

BMC SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-4-114

关键词

-

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/F006012/1]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F006012/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E036252/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/F006012/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. EPSRC [EP/E036252/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Genome-scale metabolic reconstructions have been recognised as a valuable tool for a variety of applications ranging from metabolic engineering to evolutionary studies. However, the reconstruction of such networks remains an arduous process requiring a high level of human intervention. This process is further complicated by occurrences of missing or conflicting information and the absence of common annotation standards between different data sources. Results: In this article, we report a semi-automated methodology aimed at streamlining the process of metabolic network reconstruction by enabling the integration of different genome-wide databases of metabolic reactions. We present results obtained by applying this methodology to the metabolic network of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. A systematic comparison of compounds and reactions between two genome-wide databases allowed us to obtain a high-quality core consensus reconstruction, which was validated for stoichiometric consistency. A lower level of consensus led to a larger reconstruction, which has a lower quality standard but provides a baseline for further manual curation. Conclusion: This semi-automated methodology may be applied to other organisms and help to streamline the process of genome-scale network reconstruction in order to accelerate the transfer of such models to applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据