4.7 Article

Attribution of observed changes in stratospheric ozone and temperature

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 599-609

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-599-2011

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of the Environment of Japan [A-071, B-093]
  2. Office of Science and Technology
  3. NOAA [NA08OAR4310729]
  4. US department of Energy's Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  5. US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Climate Program Office
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [ncas10009, NE/E006787/1, NE/E017150/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. NERC [NE/E006787/1, NE/E017150/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three recently-completed sets of simulations of multiple chemistry-climate models with greenhouse gases only, with all anthropogenic forcings, and with anthropogenic and natural forcings, allow the causes of observed stratospheric changes to be quantitatively assessed using detection and attribution techniques. The total column ozone response to halogenated ozone depleting substances and to natural forcings is detectable in observations, but the total column ozone response to greenhouse gas changes is not separately detectable. In the middle and upper stratosphere, simulated and observed SBUV/SAGE ozone changes are broadly consistent, and separate anthropogenic and natural responses are detectable in observations. The influence of ozone depleting substances and natural forcings can also be detected separately in observed lower stratospheric temperature, and the magnitudes of the simulated and observed responses to these forcings and to greenhouse gas changes are found to be consistent. In the mid and upper stratosphere the simulated natural and combined anthropogenic responses are detectable and consistent with observations, but the influences of greenhouse gases and ozone-depleting substances could not be separately detected in our analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据