4.6 Article

Physical activity and the rejuvenation of Connswater (PARC study): protocol for a natural experiment investigating the impact of urban regeneration on public health

期刊

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-774

关键词

Physical activity; Built environment; Natural experiment; Mixed methods; Urban regeneration; Behaviour change; Sustainability; Cost-effectiveness; Walkability

资金

  1. National Prevention Research Initiative
  2. Alzheimer's Research Trust
  3. Alzheimer's Society
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  5. British Heart Foundation
  6. Cancer Research UK
  7. Chief Scientist Office
  8. Scottish Government Health Directorate
  9. Department of Health
  10. Diabetes UK
  11. Economic and Social Research Council
  12. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  13. Health and Social Care Research and Development Division of the Public Health Agency (HSC RD Division)
  14. Medical Research Council
  15. Welsh Assembly Government and World Cancer Research Fund
  16. UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Northern Ireland
  17. MRC Methodology Research Fellowship
  18. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007438/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  19. Medical Research Council [G0902112, G0901530, G0802045, MR/K023241/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  20. ESRC [ES/G007438/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  21. MRC [G0902112, G0901530, G0802045, MR/K023241/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There is a dearth of evidence regarding the impact of urban regeneration projects on public health, particularly the nature and degree to which urban regeneration impacts upon health-related behaviour change. Natural experiment methodology enables comprehensive large-scale evaluations of such interventions. The Connswater Community Greenway in Belfast is a major urban regeneration project involving the development of a 9 km linear park, including the provision of new cycle paths and walkways. In addition to the environmental improvements, this complex intervention involves a number of programmes to promote physical activity in the regenerated area. The project affords a unique opportunity to investigate the public health impact of urban regeneration. Methods/Design: The evaluation framework was informed by the socio-ecological model and guided by the RE-AIM Framework. Key components include: (1) a quasi-experimental before-and-after survey of the Greenway population (repeated cross-sectional design), in tandem with data from a parallel Northern Ireland-wide survey for comparison; (2) an assessment of changes in the local built environment and of walkability using geographic information systems; (3) semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of survey respondents, and a range of community stakeholders, before and after the regeneration project; and (4) a cost-effectiveness analysis. The primary outcome is change in proportion of individuals identified as being regularly physically active, according to the current UK recommendations. The RE-AIM Framework will be used to make an overall assessment of the impact of the Greenway on the physical activity behaviour of local residents. Discussion: The Connswater Community Greenway provides a significant opportunity to achieve long-term, population level behaviour change. We argue that urban regeneration may be conceptualised meaningfully as a complex intervention comprising multiple components with the potential, individually and interactively, to affect the behaviour of a diverse population. The development and implementation of our comprehensive evaluation framework reflects this complexity and illuminates an approach to the empirical, rigorous evaluation of urban regeneration. More specifically, this study will add to the much needed evidence-base about the impact of urban regeneration on public health as well as having important implications for the development of natural experiment methodology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据