4.7 Article

Lessons From Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Trials in Patients With Glioblastoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 33, 期 10, 页码 1197-1213

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.9575

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01CA129371, K24CA125440A, P01CA080124, R01CA163815, R01CA159258]
  2. Proton Beam/Federal Share Program
  3. National Foundation for Cancer Research
  4. Merck
  5. Norwegian Research Council [191088/V50]
  6. South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority [2013069]
  7. NIH from the Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Research Resources) [8UL1TR000170-05]
  8. NIH from the Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences) [8UL1TR000170-05]
  9. Harvard University and its affiliated academic health care centers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Treatment of glioblastoma (GBM), the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, remains a significant unmet need in oncology. Historically, cytotoxic treatments provided little durable benefit, and tumors recurred within several months. This has spurred a substantial research effort to establish more effective therapies for both newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. In this context, antiangiogenic therapy emerged as a promising treatment strategy because GBMs are highly vascular tumors. In particular, GBMs overexpress vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a proangiogenic cytokine. Indeed, many studies have demonstrated promising radiographic response rates, delayed tumor progression, and a relatively safe profile for anti-VEGF agents. However, randomized phase III trials conducted to date have failed to show an overall survival benefit for antiangiogenic agents alone or in combination with chemoradiotherapy. These results indicate that antiangiogenic agents may not be beneficial in unselected populations of patients with GBM. Unfortunately, biomarker development has lagged behind in the process of drug development, and no validated biomarker exists for patient stratification. However, hypothesis-generating data from phase II trials that reveal an association between increased perfusion and/or oxygenation (ie, consequences of vascular normalization) and survival suggest that early imaging biomarkers could help identify the subset of patients who most likely will benefit from anti-VEGF agents. In this article, we discuss the lessons learned from the trials conducted to date and how we could potentially use recent advances in GBM biology and imaging to improve outcomes of patients with GBM who receive antiangiogenic therapy. (C) 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据