4.7 Article

Mats of psychrophilic thiotrophic bacteria associated with cold seeps of the Barents Sea

期刊

BIOGEOSCIENCES
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 2947-2960

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-9-2947-2012

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Community [GOCE-CT-2005-511234-1]
  2. Seventh Framework Programme under the HERMIONE project [226354]
  3. Helmholtz Association
  4. Max Planck Society
  5. NERC [noc010011] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [noc010011] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the bacterial diversity associated with microbial mats of polar deep-sea cold seeps. The mats were associated with high upward fluxes of sulfide produced by anaerobic oxidation of methane, and grew at temperatures close to the freezing point of seawater. They ranged from small patches of 0.2-5 m in diameter (gray mats) to extensive fields covering up to 850 m(2) of seafloor (white mats) and were formed by diverse sulfide-oxidizing bacteria differing in color and size. Overall, both the dominant mat-forming thiotrophs as well as the associated bacterial communities inhabiting the mats differed in composition for each mat type as determined by microscopy, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis. While the smaller gray mats were associated with a highly diverse composition of sulfide oxidizers, the larger white mats were composed of only 1-2 types of gliding Beggiatoa filaments. Molecular analyses showed that most of the dominant mat-forming sulfide oxidizers were phylogenetically different from, but still closely related to, thiotrophs known from warmer ocean realms. The psychrophilic nature of the polar mat-forming thiotrophs was tested by visual observation of active mats at in situ temperature compared to their warming to > 4 A degrees C. The temperature range of mat habitats and the variation of sulfide and oxygen fluxes appear to be the main factors supporting the diversity of mat-forming thiotrophs in cold seeps at continental margins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据