4.6 Article

Neighborhood fast food restaurants and fast food consumption: A national study

期刊

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-543

关键词

Epidemiology; United States; *Diet; Geographic Information Systems; Environment; Environment Design; Fast Foods; Restaurants; Young Adult; MeSH

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01HD057194, R01 HD041375, R01 HD39183]
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC SIP) [5-00]
  3. Interdisciplinary Obesity Training Program [T32MH075854-04]
  4. Carolina Population Center [5 R24 HD050924]
  5. [P01-HD31921]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Recent studies suggest that neighborhood fast food restaurant availability is related to greater obesity, yet few studies have investigated whether neighborhood fast food restaurant availability promotes fast food consumption. Our aim was to estimate the effect of neighborhood fast food availability on frequency of fast food consumption in a national sample of young adults, a population at high risk for obesity. Methods: We used national data from U.S. young adults enrolled in wave III (2001-02; ages 18-28) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (n = 13,150). Urbanicity-stratified multivariate negative binomial regression models were used to examine cross-sectional associations between neighborhood fast food availability and individual-level self-reported fast food consumption frequency, controlling for individual and neighborhood characteristics. Results: In adjusted analysis, fast food availability was not associated with weekly frequency of fast food consumption in non-urban or low-or high-density urban areas. Conclusions: Policies aiming to reduce neighborhood availability as a means to reduce fast food consumption among young adults may be unsuccessful. Consideration of fast food outlets near school or workplace locations, factors specific to more or less urban settings, and the role of individual lifestyle attitudes and preferences are needed in future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据