3.9 Article

Transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking in ultrathin keratoconic corneas

期刊

CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 1785-1792

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S37335

关键词

keratoconus; pachymetry; topography; transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking; thin cornea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The purpose of this paper was to report the results of transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) with modified riboflavin and ultraviolet A irradiation in patients affected by keratoconus, each with thinnest pachymetry values of less than 400 mu m (with epithelium) and not treatable using standard de-epithelialization techniques. Methods: Sixteen patients affected by progressive keratoconus with thinnest pachymetry values ranging from 331 mu m to 389 mu m underwent transepithelial CXL in one eye using a riboflavin 0.1% solution in 15% Dextran T500 containing ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid 0.01% and trometamol to enhance epithelial penetration. The patients underwent complete ophthalmological examination, including endothelial cell density measurements and computerized videokeratography, before CXL and at one day, one week, and one, 6, and 12 months thereafter. Results: Epithelial healing was complete in all patients after one day of use of a soft bandage contact lens. No side effects or damage to the limbal region was observed during the follow-up period. All patients showed slightly improved uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity; keratometric astigmatism showed reductions (up to 5.3 D) and apical ectasia power decreased (K-max values reduced up to 4.3 D). Endothelial cell density was unchanged. Conclusion: Application of transepithelial CXL using riboflavin with substances added to enhance epithelial permeability was safe, seemed to be moderately effective in keratoconic eyes with ultrathin corneas, and applications of the procedure could be extended to patients with advanced keratoconus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据