4.7 Article

Molecular characterization of the genome-wide BOR transporter gene family and genetic analysis of BnaC04.BOR1;1c in Brassica napus

期刊

BMC PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-018-1407-1

关键词

Brassica napus; BOR transporter; B deficiency; Transcriptional profile; B efficiency; Gene function

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0100700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772380]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2662017QD039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Boron (B) deficiency is an agricultural problem that causes significant losses of crop yield in many areas of the world. However, systematic analysis of BOR family genes for B transport in rapeseed is still lacking. We aimed to identify and characterize BOR transporters in Brassica napus and the potential role of these transporters in B homeostasis in response to B deficiency. Results: Here, we identified 20 BOR transporters from the Brassica napus genome, which were classified into six distinct groups that represent clear orthologous relationships to their family members in Arabidopsis. qRT-PCR revealed distinct expression profiles for BnBORs in different tissues and in response to external B levels. The B-efficient cultivar QY10 accumulated more B in shoots than the B-inefficient cultivar W10, and overexpression of BnaBOR1;1c could alleviate shoot B-deficiency symptoms in W10 by distributing more B from roots to shoots. Additionally, BnBOR1;1c expression was up-regulated by B deficiency, and the induction of BnBOR1;1c was more intense in QY10. Moreover, two conserved InDels were found in the promoter regions of BnBOR1;1c within different B-efficient genotypes. Conclusions: Overall, the molecular characterization of the BnBOR genes of two B-efficient cultivars and their responses to B deficiency highlights the diversity of the family members in B. napus, and BnaC4.BOR1;1c has potential as a candidate gene for improving B nutrition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据