4.6 Article

Knowledge sharing between project teams and its cultural antecedents

期刊

JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 435-447

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/13673271211238751

关键词

Knowledge sharing; Corporate culture; Organizational culture; Project teams

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - The aim of this article is to provide insights into how knowledge sharing between project teams takes place (if formal channels are not provided) and which cultural antecedents influence this process. Design/methodology/approach - The author adopts a qualitative research design using a triangulation of methods (interviews, observations, company data and group discussions) to receive detailed results for one case study Findings - The findings show that knowledge sharing between project teams takes place even though top-management did not include these processes in the formal work organization. Project team leaders as well as members share knowledge with other project teams by transferring boundary objects, interchanging team members and directly interacting. Furthermore, this study confirms some elements of a knowledge culture, but also discovers new cultural elements that are favorable and unfavorable to knowledge sharing between teams, such as personal responsibility, intrinsic motivation, top-management's trust in employees, and output orientation. Research limitations/implications - Despite the fact that only one case study could be researched with this level of detail, the results provide insights into a research area neglected thus far and show that not all knowledge processes depend on the same cultural antecedents. Practical implications - Managers and team leaders learn that knowledge sharing between project teams enhances the efficiency of project work and organizational learning. Originality/value - This study addresses a specific knowledge process, namely knowledge sharing between project teams, and discovers that specific cultural antecedents support and hinder this type of cross-boundary knowledge sharing process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据