4.2 Article

Anti-inflammatory effects of minocycline are mediated by retinoid signaling

期刊

BMC NEUROSCIENCE
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12868-018-0460-x

关键词

Minocycline; Retinoic acid; Neuroinflammation; Microglia; Cytokines

资金

  1. Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin
  2. Berlin Institute of Health
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [he 6939]
  4. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [01EE1401F]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Minocycline is a lipophilic tetracycline of increasing appeal in neuroscience as it inhibits microglial activation, a mechanism involved in numerous neuropsychiatric disorders. Own data point towards retinoid-mediated effects of minocycline in murine brain and skin, and towards a vicious cycle of neuroinflammation which is driven by microglial activation-induced breakdown of local retinoids such as retinoic acid (RA). We therefore sought to study minocycline's anti-inflammatory effects on human microglial-like monocyte-derived cells in the context of retinoid signaling. Results: As hypothesized, minocycline exposure resulted in a substantial increase of RA levels in the human monocytic cell line THP-1. While pro-inflammatory stimulation with lipopolysaccharides resulted in increased tryptophanedegrading indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase IDO-expression and TNF-alpha levels in primary human monocyte-derived microglial-like cells, this effect was attenuated by minocycline only in the presence of retinoids. The anti-inflammatory effects of minocycline on TNF-alpha expression were completely abolished by a pharmacological blockage of retinoic acid receptors (RARs) using BMS-493 and unaffected by selectively blocking retinoid-X-receptors using UVI-3003. Conclusions: Our data indicate for the first time a RA-dependent, anti-inflammatory effect for minocycline in human microglial-like cells via inhibition of local RA turnover. The RA-dependent mode of action for minocycline appears to be predominantly mediated through RAR-signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据