4.4 Review

Levodopa-Induced-Dyskinesias Clinical Features, Incidence, Risk Factors, Management and Impact on Quality of Life

期刊

JOURNAL OF PARKINSONS DISEASE
卷 2, 期 3, 页码 189-198

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JPD-2012-120103

关键词

Dyskinesia; clinical features; epidemiology; treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LID) belong to the most common dose-limiting adverse effects of levodopa therapy. Peak-dose LID occur with the maximum effect of medication, 'diphasic dyskinesias' have a beginning- and end-of-dose pattern, and the, off-period dyskinesia occur during off-periods, most frequently in the early mornings and are typically dystonic in nature. The majority of patients will have developed dyskinesias after 10 years of treatment, and about 40-50% after 5 years. Occurrence of LID appears to be related to dose and duration of treatment with levodopa and severity and duration of disease. In addition, patients with younger age of onset have been reported to have an earlier onset and higher rate of LID. The important aetiological role of non-physiological pulsatile stimulation of dopaminergic receptors is increasingly recognized and more continuous dopaminergic stimulation with the longer acting dopamine agonists has been shown to reduce and delay the onset of dyskinesias. LID may not have a significant effect on quality of life in patients with early disease or in very advanced disease stages. when often other problems arise, but in other patients they may be severely disabling. Treatment strategies to overcome LID include adjustment of timing, type and amount of dopaminergic medication, treatment with amantadine and, in treatment resistant cases, stereotactic surgery involving deep brain stimulation or lesioning procedures. A number of other pharmacological options are also being explored. Several methods for the assessment of LID are available to attempt accurate assessment of efficacy, although all of these have limitations, and further evidence on their utility if needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据