4.4 Article

A retrospective case series of segmental zoster paresis of limbs: clinical, electrophysiological and imaging characteristics

期刊

BMC NEUROLOGY
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-018-1130-4

关键词

Herpes zoster; Segmental zoster paresis; Infectious neuropathy; Nerve conduction; Electromyography; Nerve MRI

资金

  1. Taishan Scholars Construction Engineering of Shandong Province [ts20130914]
  2. Medicine and Health Science Technology Development Programme of Shandong Province [2015WS0226]
  3. Key Research and Development Plan of Shandong Province [GG201709190225]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Segmental zoster paresis (SZP) of limbs, characterized by focal weakness of extremity, is recognized as a rare complication of herpes zoster (HZ). The following study analyzes the clinical characteristics and data from electromyography and MRI scans in patients with motor weakness after zoster infection. Methods: One thousand three hundred ninety-three patients from our database (Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital) suffering from HZ were retrospectively reviewed from June 2015 to July 2017. Patients who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for SZP were included in the analysis. The clinical characteristics, as well as electromyography findings and MRI scans were analyzed. Results: SZP was present in 0.57% of patients with HZ (8/1393). The average age of symptom onset in 8 SZP patients was 69 years old (SD: 13, range 47-87). The severity of muscle weakness ranged from mild to severe. The electrophysiological testing revealed the characteristics of axonopathy. Radiculopathy (2/8), plexopathy (2/8), radiculoplexopathy (3/8) and combined radiculopathy and mononeuropathy (1/8) were also identified. MRI revealed hyperintensity of the affected spinal dorsal horns, nerve roots or peripheral nerves. Conclusions: SZP is associated with obvious limb weakness, nerve axons lesions and localization to nerve roots, plexus or peripheral nerves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据