4.4 Article

CIDP, myasthenia gravis, and membranous glomerulonephritis - three autoimmune disorders in one patient: a case report

期刊

BMC NEUROLOGY
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-018-1120-6

关键词

Autoimmunity; T cells; Autoantibodies; Neuromuscular; Neuroinflammation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We present a patient fulfilling the electrophysiological criteria for definite chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (MG), and membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) confirmed by biopsy. To our knowledge, this is the first case of the concomitant appearance of these three autoimmune diseases in a single patient. Case representation: A 42-year-old Caucasian male presented with rapidly progressive gait disturbance, distal weakness of the lower extremities, ascending hypoesthesia, impaired fine motor skills, and beginning cranial nerve palsy showing dysarthrophonia, facial paralysis, and eye movement abnormalities and was diagnosed as rapid onset (atypical) CIDP. After 3 months, the patient complained of increasing physical exhaustion, reduction of his walking distance, worsening of the residual dysphagia, and dysarthria with an inability to swallow. AChR antibodies (17.0 nmol/L, RF < 0.4) and titin antibodies were positive and repetitive nerve stimulation showed an abnormal decrement matching the criteria of myasthenia gravis. Over time the patient developed severe acute-on-chronic renal failure with high-grade proteinuria resulting in generalized edema followed by secondary hyperparathyroidism and dialysis-dependent renal failure. Renal biopsy confirmed beginning anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody membranous nephropathy. Conclusion: All three diseases are of autoimmune origin with distinctive immunopathogenetic mechanisms. The present case of CIDP, MG, and MGN occurring in one patient indicates a common underlying immune mechanism in these distinct conditions, including the involvement of autoantibodies and T cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据