4.2 Review

Four decades of lean: a systematic literature review

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 112-132

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/20401461211243702

关键词

Lean production; Research work; Manufacturing systems; Lean manufacturing; Lean thinking; Toyota Production System; Lean assessment; Lean culture; Lean transformation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic review of four decades of scholarly lean literature and identify phases of lean while highlighting core knowledge and voids from within the scholarly lean literature. Design/methodology/approach - The methodology applied to better understand lean over the past four decades was a systematic review of literature, as described by Machi and McEvoy in The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success. Findings - This literature review has synthesized and categorized four decades of scholarly literature, alongwith influential books from credible researchers and practitioners of lean, in an effort to decipher the lean thinking paradigm from jargon to a commonly-shared language. In total, five themes evolved fromthe analysis starting with the Discovery phase (1970-1990), Dissemination phase (1991-1996), Implementation phase (1997-2000), Enterprise phase (2001-2005), and the most recent phase of Performance (2006-2009). Research limitations/implications - The literature review was limited to articles available to the researcher using search terms restricted to: lean manufacturing, lean production, lean thinking, lean and review, lean and Toyota Production System, lean assessment, lean culture, lean transformation. The databases accessed through EBSCO were: Academic Source Premier, Business Source Premier, ERIC, and PsycINFO. Originality/value - Publications tracing the lineage of lean over the past four decades are sparse, based on lean scholarly literature, exposing a void in the knowledge base. This literature review should assist other scholars and practitioners who are interested in substantiating their lean endeavours.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据