4.4 Article

Interferon beta 1b following natalizumab discontinuation: one year, randomized, prospective, pilot trial

期刊

BMC NEUROLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-101

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; Natalizumab; Interferon beta1b; De-escalation; Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

资金

  1. Bayer Health Care Pharmaceuticals
  2. Fresenius Medical Care
  3. UCB
  4. Ospedale Regionale di Lugano
  5. ETH Zurich
  6. Teva Neuroscience

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Natalizumab (NTZ) discontinuation leads to multiple sclerosis reactivation. The objective of this study is to compare disease activity in MS patients who continued on NTZ treatment to those who were switched to subcutaneous interferon 1b (IFNB) treatment. Methods: 1-year randomized, rater-blinded, parallel-group, pilot study (ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT01144052). Relapsing remitting MS patients on NTZ for >= 12 months who had been free of disease activity on this therapy (no relapses and disability progression for >= 6 months, no gadolinium-enhancing lesions on baseline MRI) were randomized to NTZ or IFNB. Primary endpoint was time to first on-study relapse. Additional clinical, MRI and safety parameters were assessed. Analysis was based on intention to treat. Results: 19 patients (NTZ n=10; IFNB n=9) with similar baseline characteristics were included. 78% of IFNB treated patients remained relapse free (NTZ group: 100%), and 25% remained free of new T2 lesions (NTZ group: 62.5%). While time to first on-study relapse was not significantly different between groups (p=0.125), many secondary clinical and radiological endpoints (number of relapses, proportion of relapse free patients, number of new T2 lesions) showed a trend, or were significant (new T2 lesions at month 6) in favoring NTZ. Conclusions: De-escalation therapy from NTZ to IFNB over 1 year was associated with some clinical and radiological disease recurrence. Overall no major safety concerns were observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据