4.7 Article

Long-term changes in lower tropospheric baseline ozone concentrations at northern mid-latitudes

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 12, 期 23, 页码 11485-11504

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-11485-2012

关键词

-

资金

  1. NOAA's Health of the Atmosphere and Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Programs
  2. European Union [FP7-ENV-2010/265148]
  3. Global Environment Research Fund of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan [S-7-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Changes in baseline (here understood as representative of continental to hemispheric scales) tropospheric O-3 concentrations that have occurred at northern mid-latitudes over the past six decades are quantified from available measurement records with the goal of providing benchmarks to which retrospective model calculations of the global O-3 distribution can be compared. Eleven data sets (ten ground-based and one airborne) including six European (beginning in the 1950's and before), three North American (beginning in 1984) and two Asian (beginning in 1991) are analyzed. When the full time periods of the data records are considered a consistent picture emerges; O-3 has increased at all sites in all seasons at approximately 1% yr(-1) relative to the site's 2000 yr mixing ratio in each season. For perspective, this rate of increase sustained from 1950 to 2000 corresponds to an approximate doubling. There is little if any evidence for statistically significant differences in average rates of increase among the sites, regardless of varying length of data records. At most sites (most definitively at the European sites) the rate of increase has slowed over the last decade (possibly longer), to the extent that at present O-3 is decreasing at some sites in some seasons, particularly in summer. The average rate of increase before 2000 shows significant seasonal differences (1.08 +/- 0.09, 0.89 +/- 0.10, 0.85 +/- 0.11 and 1.21 +/- 0.12% yr(-1) in spring, summer, autumn and winter, respectively, over North America and Europe).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据