4.5 Article

The influence of expectation on spinal manipulation induced hypoalgesia: An experimental study in normal subjects

期刊

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-19

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCCIH NIH HHS [R21 AT002796-02, R21 AT002796-01A1, R21 AT002796] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [T32 HD043730, T32HD043730] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The mechanisms thorough which spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) exerts clinical effects are not established. A prior study has suggested a dorsal horn modulated effect; however, the role of subject expectation was not considered. The purpose of the current study was to determine the effect of subject expectation on hypoalgesia associated with SMT. Methods: Sixty healthy subjects agreed to participate and underwent quantitative sensory testing (QST) to their leg and low back. Next, participants were randomly assigned to receive a positive, negative, or neutral expectation instructional set regarding the effects of a specific SMT technique on pain perception. Following the instructional set, all subjects received SMT and underwent repeat QST. Results: No interaction (p = 0.38) between group assignment and pain response was present in the lower extremity following SMT; however, a main effect (p < 0.01) for hypoalgesia was present. A significant interaction was present between change in pain perception and group assignment in the low back (p = 0.01) with participants receiving a negative expectation instructional set demonstrating significant hyperalgesia (p < 0.01). Conclusion: The current study replicates prior findings of c-fiber mediated hypoalgesia in the lower extremity following SMT and this occurred regardless of expectation. A significant increase in pain perception occurred following SMT in the low back of participants receiving negative expectation suggesting a potential influence of expectation on SMT induced hypoalgesia in the body area to which the expectation is directed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据