3.9 Article

Natural antisense transcript of natriuretic peptide precursor A (NPPA): structural organization and modulation of NPPA expression

期刊

BMC MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2199-10-81

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [070191/z/03/z]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute [55005617]
  3. Estonian Ministry of Education and Science core [0182721s06]
  4. Estonian Science Foundation [ETF6597]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Mammalian transcriptome contains a large proportion of diverse and structurally complex noncoding RNAs. One class of such RNAs, natural antisense transcripts (NATs), are derived from the opposite strand of many protein-coding genes. Although the exact structure and functional relevance of most of the NATs is unknown, their emerging role as gene expression regulators raises the hypothesis that NATs might contribute to development of complex human disorders. The goal of our study was to investigate the involvement of NATs in regulation of candidate genes for blood pressure. Results: First we analysed blood pressure candidate genes for the presence of natural antisense transcripts. In silico analysis revealed that seven genes (ADD3, NPPA, ATP1A1, NPR2, CYP17A1, ACSM3, SLC14A2) have an antisense partner transcribed from the opposite strand. We characterized NPPA and its antisense transcript (NPPA-AS) in more detail. We found that NPPA-AS is expressed in a number of human tissues as a collection of alternatively spliced isoforms and that NPPA-AS and NPPA can form RNA duplexes in vivo. We also demonstrated that a specific NPPA-AS isoform is capable of down-regulating the intron-retained NPPA mRNA variant. We studied the evolutionary conservation of NPPA-AS and were able to detect the presence of Nppa-as transcript in mouse. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate functional interaction of NPPA-AS with NPPA at the RNA level and suggest that antisense transcription might be an important post-transcriptional mechanism modulating NPPA expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据