4.8 Article

Gas-Phase FRET Efficiency Measurements To Probe the Conformation of Mass-Selected Proteins

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 87, 期 15, 页码 7559-7565

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01591

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canada Research Chairs Program
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  4. Province of Ontario
  5. Human Frontier Science Program
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrospray ionization and mass spectrometry have revolutionized the chemical analysis of biological molecules, including proteins. However, the correspondence between a proteins native structure and its structure in the mass spectrometer (where it is gaseous) remains unclear. Here, we show that fluorescence (Forster) resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurements combined with mass spectrometry provides intramolecular distance constraints in gaseous, ionized proteins. Using an experimental setup which combines trapping mass spectrometry and laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy, the structure of a fluorescently labeled mutant variant of the protein GB1 was probed as a function of charge state. Steady-state fluorescence emission spectra and time-resolved donor fluorescence measurements of mass-selected GB1 show a marked decrease in the FRET efficiency with increasing number of charges on the gaseous protein, which suggests a Coulombically driven unfolding and expansion of its structure. This lies in stark contrast to the pH stability of GB1 in solution. Comparison with solution-phase single-molecule FRET measurements show lower FRET efficiency for all charge states of the gaseous protein examined, indicating that the ensemble of conformations present in the gas phase is, on average, more expanded than the native form. These results represent the first FRET measurements on a mass-selected protein and illustrate the utility of FRET for obtaining a new kind of structural information for large, desolvated biomolecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据