4.8 Review

Modeling influenza epidemics and pandemics: insights into the future of swine flu (H1N1)

期刊

BMC MEDICINE
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-7-30

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI041935] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we present a review of the literature of influenza modeling studies, and discuss how these models can provide insights into the future of the currently circulating novel strain of influenza A (H1N1), formerly known as swine flu. We discuss how the feasibility of controlling an epidemic critically depends on the value of the Basic Reproduction Number (R-0). The R-0 for novel influenza A (H1N1) has recently been estimated to be between 1.4 and 1.6. This value is below values of R-0 estimated for the 1918-1919 pandemic strain (mean R-0 similar to 2: range 1.4 to 2.8) and is comparable to R-0 values estimated for seasonal strains of influenza (mean R-0 1.3: range 0.9 to 2.1). By reviewing results from previous modeling studies we conclude it is theoretically possible that a pandemic of H1N1 could be contained. However it may not be feasible, even in resource-rich countries, to achieve the necessary levels of vaccination and treatment for control. As a recent modeling study has shown, a global cooperative strategy will be essential in order to control a pandemic. This strategy will require resource-rich countries to share their vaccines and antivirals with resource-constrained and resource-poor countries. We conclude our review by discussing the necessity of developing new biologically complex models. We suggest that these models should simultaneously track the transmission dynamics of multiple strains of influenza in bird, pig and human populations. Such models could be critical for identifying effective new interventions, and informing pandemic preparedness planning. Finally, we show that by modeling cross-species transmission it may be possible to predict the emergence of pandemic strains of influenza.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据