4.6 Article

Transient thermal modeling of permafrost conditions in Southern Norway

期刊

CRYOSPHERE
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 719-739

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/tc-7-719-2013

关键词

-

资金

  1. CRYOLINK project (Permafrost and seasonal frost in Southern Norway) [185987/V30]
  2. CRYOMET project (Bridging models for the terrestrial cryosphere and the atmosphere) [2114465/V30]
  3. Norwegian Research Council and the Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo (UiO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermal modeling is a powerful tool to infer the temperature regime of the ground in permafrost areas. We present a transient permafrost model, CryoGrid 2, that calculates ground temperatures according to conductive heat transfer in the soil and in the snowpack. CryoGrid 2 is forced by operational air temperature and snow-depth products for potential permafrost areas in Southern Norway for the period 1958 to 2009 at 1 km(2) spatial resolution. In total, an area of about 80 000 km(2) is covered. The model results are validated against borehole temperatures, permafrost probability maps from bottom temperature of snow measurements and inventories of landforms indicative of permafrost occurrence. The validation demonstrates that CryoGrid 2 can reproduce the observed lower permafrost limit to within 100 m at all validation sites, while the agreement between simulated and measured borehole temperatures is within 1 K for most sites. The number of grid cells with simulated permafrost does not change significantly between the 1960s and 1990s. In the 2000s, a significant reduction of about 40% of the area with average 2 m ground temperatures below 0 degrees C is found, which mostly corresponds to degrading permafrost with still negative temperatures in deeper ground layers. The thermal conductivity of the snow is the largest source of uncertainty in CryoGrid 2, strongly affecting the simulated permafrost area. Finally, the prospects of employing CryoGrid 2 as an operational soil-temperature product for Norway are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据