4.2 Article

Effortful Control in Hot and Cool Tasks Differentially Predicts Children's Behavior Problems and Academic Performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 43-56

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10802-012-9661-4

关键词

Effortful control; Behavior problems; Academic performance

资金

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD069171] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [K02MH001446, R01MH063096] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effortful control (EC), the capacity to deliberately suppress a dominant response and perform a subdominant response, rapidly developing in toddler and preschool age, has been shown to be a robust predictor of children's adjustment. Not settled, however, is whether a view of EC as a heterogeneous rather than unidimensional construct may offer advantages in the context of predicting diverse developmental outcomes. This study focused on the potential distinction between hot EC function (delay-of-gratification tasks that called for suppressing an emotionally charged response) and more abstract cool EC functions (motor inhibition tasks, suppressing-initiating response or Go-No Go tasks, and effortful attention or Stroop-like tasks). Children (N = 100) were observed performing EC tasks at 38 and 52 months. Mothers, fathers, and teachers rated children's behavior problems and academic performance at 67, 80, and 100 months, and children participated in a clinical interview at 100 months. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analyses with latent variables produced consistent findings across all informants: Children's scores in hot EC tasks, presumably engaging emotion regulation skills, predicted behavior problems but not academic performance, whereas their scores in cool EC tasks, specifically those engaging effortful attention, predicted academic performance but not behavior problems. The models of EC as a heterogeneous construct offered some advantages over the unidimensional models. Methodological and clinical implications of the findings are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据