4.4 Review

Issues in localization of brain function: The case of lateralized frontal cortex in cognition, emotion, and psychopathology

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00002

关键词

emotion; motivation; frontal cortex; lateralization; localization

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [R01 MH39628, MH61358, ROI MH65429, P50 MH079485, F31 MH068123, T32 MH14257, T32 MH19554]
  2. National Institute of Drug Abuse [R21 DA141 11]
  3. Department of Psychology
  4. Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  5. Zukunftskolleg of the University of Konstanz

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The appeal of simple, sweeping portraits of large-scale brain mechanisms relevant to psychological phenomena competes with a rich, complex research base. As a prominent example, two views of frontal brain organization have emphasized dichotomous lateralization as a function of either emotional valence (positive/negative) or approach/avoidance motivation. Compelling findings support each. The literature has struggled to choose between them for three decades, without success. Both views are proving untenable as comprehensive models. Evidence of other frontal lateralizations, involving distinctions among dimensions of depression and anxiety, make a dichotomous view even more problematic. Recent evidence indicates that positive valence and approach motivation are associated with different areas in the left-hemisphere. Findings that appear contradictory at the level of frontal lobes as the units of analysis can be accommodated because hemodynamic and electromagnetic neuroimaging studies suggest considerable functional differentiation, in specialization and activation, of subregions of frontal cortex, including their connectivity to each other and to other regions. Such findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of functional localization that accommodates aspects of multiple theoretical perspectives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据