4.6 Review

Living with chronic illness in adults: a concept analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
卷 24, 期 17-18, 页码 2357-2367

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12827

关键词

adults; concept analysis; Living with chronic illness; nursing; Rodgers

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims and objectivesTo report an analysis of the concept of Living with chronic illness in adults, using Rodger's evolutionary analytical methodology. BackgroundIn the literature, several qualitative studies exist that address the question of Living with chronic illness from the adult patient's perspective. However, the lack of clarity and consensus among the existing studies renders this concept ambiguous when it is analysed in depth. DesignA narrative review. MethodsA systematic search has been carried out on electronic databases such as Medline (PubMed), Cinahl (Ebsco), Cochrane Library, PsycINFO (Ovid), Embase, Cuiden, Dialnet and Scielo. This was limited to articles published in either Spanish or English, from 2003-2013. ResultsLiving with chronic illness is a complex, dynamic, cyclic and multidimensional process, and involves the development of five different attributes: Acceptance, Coping, Self-management, Integration and Adjustment. Depending on how these attributes operate, there are four different ways of living which can result from the process of Living with chronic illness: (1) Disavowal, (2) False Normality, (3) The New Normal and (4) Disruption. ConclusionsThis paper contributes to the understanding of the concept Living with chronic illness'. Findings in this analysis have to be evaluated with caution and further research is needed on this topic to confirm them. Also, more studies in evaluating how patients live a long-term condition are recommended to foster patient-centred care. Relevance to clinical practiceFindings generated from this concept analysis can raise awareness of Living with chronic illness so that this process could be assessed in a correct and uniform way in the clinical community and improved when needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据