3.8 Article

Global Agriculture and Climate Change

期刊

JOURNAL OF CROP IMPROVEMENT
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 667-692

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15427528.2013.845051

关键词

Adaptation strategies; agricultural losses; anthropogenic activities; economic cost; food security; global warming; greenhouses gases; mitigation strategies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate change, caused by anthropogenic activities, is a universal phenomenon across the globe. There is general consensus that combating climate change will require a set of internationally coordinated policy interventions for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions besides addressing regional or global vulnerabilities, development patterns, equity distribution, and technology transfer. Agriculture is both a victim and an abettor of climate change. Serious attention is thus required, not only to enhance its adaptation capacity but also to exploit its mitigation potential as a carbon sink. A sustainable policy shift toward enhanced food security, preservation of freshwater resources, prevention of soil degradation, and maintenance of biological diversity and ecosystems remain the hallmark of mitigation strategies. Improved adaptive capacity relative to climate-resilient agriculture needs to be integrated with global developmental paths aimed at reducing social inequalities and alleviating poverty. The United Nations' Millennium Development Goals provide an excellent backdrop for integrating adaptation and sustenance into global development polity. World essentially requires a climate closest to which all forms of life have adapted during their evolution. Deceleration of carbon emissions and a shift to a long-term and sustainable growth paradigm are essential imperatives, notwithstanding the associated economic costs. Research has shown that benefits of reducing methane emissions alone would be to the tune of US$700-US$ 5000 per metric ton, whereas the abatement costs have been estimated to be less than US$250.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据