4.5 Article

Epidemiological features and risk factors associated with the spatial and temporal distribution of human brucellosis in China

期刊

BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-547

关键词

Infectious diseases; Pandemics; Disease outbreaks; Risk assessment; Public health

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81172728]
  2. Basic Work on Special Program for Science & Technology Research [2013FY114600]
  3. Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinic Epidemiology [2013LCLB01]
  4. Special Program for Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases in China [2013ZX10004218]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Human brucellosis incidence in China has been increasing dramatically since 1999. However, epidemiological features and potential factors underlying the re-emergence of the disease remain less understood. Methods: Data on human and animal brucellosis cases at the county scale were collected for the year 2004 to 2010. Also collected were environmental and socioeconomic variables. Epidemiological features including spatial and temporal patterns of the disease were characterized, and the potential factors related to the spatial heterogeneity and the temporal trend of were analysed using Poisson regression analysis, Granger causality analysis, and autoregressive distributed lag (ADL) models, respectively. Results: The epidemic showed a significantly higher spatial correlation with the number of sheep and goats than swine and cattle. The disease was most prevalent in grassland areas with elevation between 800-1,600 meters. The ADL models revealed that local epidemics were correlated with comparatively lower temperatures and less sunshine in winter and spring, with a 1-7 month lag before the epidemic peak in May. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that human brucellosis tended to occur most commonly in grasslands at moderate elevation where sheep and goats were the predominant livestock, and in years with cooler winter and spring or less sunshine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据