3.9 Review

Diagnosis and Treatment of Bone Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Spotlight on Spinal Involvement

期刊

SCIENTIFICA
卷 2013, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2013/104546

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Italian Association Against Leukemia, Rimini Section (RiminiAil)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone disease is observed in almost 80% of newly diagnosed symptomaticmultiplemyelomapatients, and spine is the bone site that is more frequently affected bymyeloma-induced osteoporosis, osteolyses, or compression fractures. In almost 20% of the cases, spinal cord compressionmay occur; diagnosis and treatment must be carried out rapidly in order to avoid a permanent sensitive ormotor defect. Although whole body skeletal X-ray is considered mandatory for multiple myeloma staging, magnetic resonance imaging is presently considered the most appropriate diagnostic technique for the evaluation of vertebral alterations, as it allows to detect not only the exact morphology of the lesions, but also the pattern of bone marrow infiltration by the disease. Multiple treatment modalities can be used to manage multiple myeloma-related vertebral lesions. Surgery or radiotherapy is mainly employed in case of spinal cord compression, impending fractures, or intractable pain. Percutaneous vertebroplasty or balloon kyphoplasty can reduce local pain in a significant fraction of treated patients, without interfering with subsequent therapeutic programs. Systemic antimyeloma therapy with conventional chemotherapy or, more appropriately, with combinations of conventional chemotherapy and compounds acting on both neoplastic plasma cells and bone marrow microenvironment must be soon initiated in order to reduce bone resorption and, possibly, promote bone formation. Bisphosphonates should also be used in combination with antimyeloma therapy as they reduce bone resorption and prolong patients survival. Amultidisciplinary approach is thus needed in order to properly manage spinal involvement in multiple myeloma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据