4.3 Article

Optical coherence tomography predicts visual outcome for pituitary tumors

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 1098-1104

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.02.001

关键词

Optical coherence tomography; Pituitary tumor; Predictive outcome; Recovery; Vision

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluate if the relationship between optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and visual outcome continued over long-term visual recovery in 107 patients undergoing pituitary decompression. Recently, it has been recognized that OCT of the RNFL has prognostic value in predicting visual outcomes after surgery for chiasmal compression caused by pituitary tumours. Patients were followed up at three time points: pre-operative (visit 1), 6-10 weeks post-operative (visit 2) and 9-15 months follow-up (visit 3). We found that patients with thin pre-operative RNFL had more severe visual field defects (mean deviation [MD] -9.22 versus -3.96 decibels[dB]; p = 0.001), but pre-operative visual acuity (VA) was good in both normal and thin RNFL groups (Snellen VA 6/5 and 6/4; p = 0.039). For those with thin RNFL the greatest improvement was between visit 2 and 3 (MD -7.1 dB versus -3.4 dB, respectively; p < 0.001) compared with pre-operative -9.8 dB. Normal RNFL patients showed greatest improvement between visits 1 and 2 (pre-operative -4.8 dB, visit 2 -2.0 dB, visit 3 -0.9 dB; p = 0.001). For long-term follow-up, 81.0% of eyes with normal RNFL, compared to 37.1% with thin RNFL (p <0.001), achieved an MD of -2.00 dB (final visit). At final follow-up, 97.5% of normal RNFL eyes achieved VA of 6/12 or better compared with 88.2% with thin RNFL (p = 0.034). Our results indicate that long-term visual recovery after surgical decompression of pituitary lesions is predicted by pre-operative OCT RNFL. Patients with normal RNFL thickness show an increased propensity for visual recovery. This effect continues after long-term follow-up, however, most visual recovery occurs within the first 6-10 weeks. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据