4.5 Article

Household transmission of respiratory viruses - assessment of viral, individual and household characteristics in a population study of healthy Australian adults

期刊

BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-345

关键词

Epidemiology; Transmission; Influenza; human; Influenza vaccines; Respiratory tract infection

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage Project [LP0989464]
  2. CSL Limited, Victoria, Australia
  3. Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
  4. University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)'s (NHMRC) Capacity Building Grant [358425]
  6. ARC Future Fellowship [FT110100250]
  7. NHMRC Career Development Award [566635]
  8. GlaxoSmithKline Australia
  9. Wyeth Australia
  10. Abbott
  11. Baxter
  12. CSL
  13. GSK
  14. MedImmune
  15. Merck
  16. Novartis
  17. Sanofi-Pasteur
  18. Wyeth
  19. Pfizer
  20. Australian Research Council [LP0989464] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Household transmission of influenza-like illness (ILI) may vary with viral and demographic characteristics. We examined the effect of these factors in a population-based sample of adults with ILI. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study in community-dwelling Australian adults nested within an influenza vaccine effectiveness trial. On presentation with ILI, participants were swabbed for a range of respiratory viruses and asked to return a questionnaire collecting details of household members with or without similar symptoms. We used logistic and Poisson regression to assess the key characteristics of household transmission. Results: 258 participants from multi-occupancy households experienced 279 ILI episodes and returned a questionnaire. Of these, 183 were the primary case in the household allowing assessment of factors associated with transmission. Transmission was significantly associated in univariate analyses with female sex (27% vs. 13%, risk ratio (RR) = 2.13 (1.08, 4.21)) and the presence of a child in the house (33% vs. 17%, RR = 1.90 (1.11, 3.26)). The secondary household attack proportion (SHAP) was 0.14, higher if influenza was isolated (RR = 2.1 (1.0, 4.5)). Vaccinated participants who nonetheless became infected with influenza had a higher SHAP (Incidence RR = 5.24 (2.17, 12.6)). Conclusions: The increased SHAP in households of vaccinated participants who nonetheless had confirmed influenza infection supports the hypothesis that in years of vaccine mismatch, not only is influenza vaccine less protective for the vaccine recipient, but that the population's immunity is also lower.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据