3.8 Article

Reducing social isolation and promoting well being in older people

期刊

QUALITY IN AGEING AND OLDER ADULTS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 25-35

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/14717791311311085

关键词

Older people; Social isolation; Social support; Friendship clubs; Elderly people; Mental health

资金

  1. charity Brendoncare

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to report on a three year research project exploring the impacts of an intervention seeking to reduce social isolation in older people. Design/methodology/approach - This study used qualitative research methods and a participative approach to facilitate the generation of the research objectives and process. Participant observation and individual/focus group interviews were used to collect data from 100 participants. Findings - Overall the perceived benefits for attendees of attending the friendship clubs fell into three key areas: improved well being, social relations and mental and physical health. Research limitations/implications - A weakness of the participant observation method includes the possibility that the presence of the researcher influenced the findings. The process of gaining different data sets (observation, interviews and focus groups) and checking findings with another researcher and the research participants as the study progressed reduced the likelihood of this bias occurring. This study only considered individuals who attended the clubs. There are many who may not get this opportunity and the issue of how to engage with them through this type of intervention is not addressed. Originality/value - This study adds to the literature to guide practice and service provision as it introduces the finding that even when living with their families, older people can still feel socially isolated. In addition, this study found that club members and volunteers viewed themselves as assets for each other, offering support, advice and friendship - an important finding for service commissioners and providers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据