4.5 Article

Epidemiology and cost of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia among patients treated in primary care centres in the valencian community of Spain

期刊

BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-302

关键词

-

资金

  1. Conselleria de Sanitat of the Generalitat Valenciana (Diari official de la Generalitat Valenciana (DOGV) [A.P. 021/06, 5.373]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Data on the epidemiology and costs related to herpes zoster (HZ) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) in Spain are scarce; therefore, studies are needed to evaluate the epidemiological and economic impact of HZ and its most common complication, PHN. The present study aimed to estimate the clinical and economic burden of HZ and PHN in Valencia (Spain). Methods: We prospectively analyzed the burden of HZ and PHN and their attributable costs in patients from 25 general practices in the Autonomous Community of Valencia serving 36,030 persons aged > 14 years. All patients with a clinical diagnosis of HZ who attended these centers between December 1(st) 2006 and November 30(th) 2007 were asked to participate. Patients included were followed for 1 year. Results: Of the 130 cases of HZ followed up, continued pain was experienced by 47.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 35.6-56.7%) at 1 month after rash onset, by 14.5% (95% CI = 7.8-1.2%) at 3 months, by 9.0% (95% CI = 3.7-14.3%) at 6 months, and by 5.9% (95% CI = 1.5-10.3%) at 12 months. The percentage of patients with PHN increased with age, from 21.4% (95% CI = 8.3-40) in patients < 50 years to 59.2% (95% CI = 44.4- 74) in patients = 70 years. The estimated total cost for the 130 HZ cases during the follow-up period was (sic)49,160 ($67,349). Mean cost per patient was (sic)378 (range 53- 2,830) ($517, range 73-3,877). Conclusions: This study shows that PHN is a relatively common complication of HZ and that both conditions combined give rise to a significant clinical and economic burden for patients and providers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据