4.1 Article

Au as an efficient promoter for electrocatalytic oxidation of formic acid and carbon monoxide: a comparison between Pt-on-Au and PtAu alloy catalysts

期刊

GOLD BULLETIN
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 175-184

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13404-013-0098-5

关键词

Pt-on-Au catalyst; PtAu alloy; Electrocatalytic activity; Formic acid; CO stripping voltammograms

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51073114, 20933007, 21173261, 51073074, 50963002]
  2. Academic Award for Young Graduate Scholar of Soochow University
  3. Opening Project of Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Electronic Information Materials and Devices [XJYS0901-2010-01]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The absence of unpaired d-electrons of gold leads to its lack of reactivity and paucity of catalytic activity. Synergistic activity of bimetallic PtAu has been proved, and its structure greatly influences on the electrocatalytic activity toward formic acid and carbon monoxide oxidation. Here, a comparison between Pt-modified Au (designated as Pt-on-Au) and PtAu alloy catalysts has been studied. The Pt-on-Au catalyst was prepared by electrodeposition of Pt on the pre-prepared Au, while PtAu alloy was obtained by co-electrodeposition. As a whole, both types of PtAu catalysts were found to be more active toward formic acid electrooxidation compared to pure Pt, exhibiting maximum activity on Pt-on-Au catalyst with Pt to Au atomic ratio of 1:10.22. Moreover, the Pt/Au atomic ratio directly relates to the oxidation pathway of formic acid and carbon monoxide oxidation. The results may be ascribed to much less COads on the surface than single Pt catalyst due to the effect of Au nanoparticles. CO stripping voltammograms present the obvious variation between Pt-on-Au and PtAu alloy catalysts. Meanwhile, the electrocatalytic activities of bimetallic PtAu are evaluated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and Tafel analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据