4.3 Article

Adjacent segment degeneration after single-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion: Disc space distraction and its impact on clinical outcomes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 566-569

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.08.019

关键词

Adjacent segment degeneration; Anterior cervical decompression and fusion; Cervical alignment; Disc height

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to find whether excessive distraction of the disc space for cage insertion was a risk factor for adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). One hundred and sixteen consecutive patients who underwent ACDF for single-level cervical disc herniation between June 2006 and November 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative, postoperative and final follow-up disc height (DH), sagittal segmental alignment (SSA), and sagittal alignment of the cervical spine (SACS) were measured and compared between the ASD group and non-ASD group. In 116 patients, ASD was radiographically proven in 28(24.1%) patients. The clinical outcomes were significantly improved compared to the preoperative scores in both groups. However, the postoperative and final follow-up DH of the ASD group were significantly higher than in the non-ASD group (p < 0.05). In addition, the postoperative DH was significantly correlated with the postoperative or final follow-up SSA (p < 0.05). However, postoperative DH was not found to significantly correlate with postoperative or final follow-up SACS (p = 0.072 and p = 0.096, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that postoperative DI-I was the most significant risk factor for ASD. The clinical outcomes of ACDF for single-level degenerative cervical disc disease were satisfactory. Postoperative DH (the distracted distance) had the greatest impact on the incidence of ASD. Excessive disc space distraction is a considerable risk factor for the development of radiographic ASD. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据